Saturday, May 5, 2012

Testimonials From Large Diesel Applications Using Xtreme Fuel Treatment

The following are the testimonials from large industrial companies and large diesel applications usingXtreme Fuel Treatment.
Some companies have allowed to have their company or employee names published, while others have chosen not to have their names used in order to eliminate calls to their company offices.
“After purchasing my Peterbilt 379, with a 550 hp. Cat., I was disappointed in the fuel mileage, averaging 4.7 mpg. At about 30,000 miles, I received a Sample of Xtreme Fuel Treatment.
Since using the product, my mileage has increased to 5.7 up to 6.2 mpg, and being an owner-operator, the rising cost of fuel eats into the profit.
This product is saving me $$ everyday.”
Thank you,
Jacksonville, FL
To: Syntek Global Inc.
From: Operations Specialist, Dry Shipping
“Having reviewed the performance of Xtreme Fuel Treatment for the last 7 months, it appears to improve burner efficiently and heat output with the fuel oil we are currently using.
We took our oil storage tank out of service in February for routine inspection and repairs. We found approximately 1.5 to 2 feet of sludge build-up in the bottom of the tank which indicates, to some degree, our oil quality, during this period we were unable to use Xtreme Fuel Treatment and our usage rate is up an average of .35 gallons per ton.
Since new management has come, we have changed several operation parameters. One of those parameters is system temperature, which we raised to help improve product hardness. Previous history indicates that the plant was some what rate limited due to the burners ability to generate enough heat. While using Xtreme Fuel Treatment, we have not experienced any problems generating enough heat at high production rates.
Stack testing was done in March for compliance, with no major problems. Hydrocarbons and fluorides were low. During my 7 months, we have had no down time related to fuel oil problems or burner gun problems created by the fuel oil.
In conclusion, I believe that Xtreme Fuel Treatment has made a significant difference in the operation of the burner and plant operations.
The Purpose of this letter is to state that we a ken Racing have used Xtreme Fuel Treatment (Combustion Catalyst – Burn Rate Modifier & Lubricant) and found many favorable results.
In all of the Dyno Tests that were run, we saw both an increase in Horsepower and Torque using your product. We also saw a decrease in Exhaust Gas Temperatures.
In actual Race Car Testing on the track we found we were able to take fuel out of the carburetor because of greater Fuel Efficiency. Also, in Plug Checks, we found the plugs burned cleaner and much longer before fouling out under racing conditions.”
Crew Chief
To: Syntek Global Inc.
From: Senior Process Engineering
“Having reviewed the environmental test results, the field carbon mass data, and the plant performance, I feel the following conclusions may be drawn.
Greater burn efficiency was achieved during the treated test than during the untreated test.
It took an additional 0.39 GPT to heat the product with the untreated oil, thus a 9.7% reduction in fuel consumption was realized during the treated test. The carbon mass test showed a 70% reduction in volatile hydrocarbons reaching the stack with the treated fuel vs. the untreated fuel. These tests confirm the earlier findings that the treated fuel yielded more BTU/lb than the untreated.
Improved environmental conditions were achieved with the improved combustion of fuel.
The reduction of unburned fuel in the gas stream improved opacity and lowered the stack temperature.
This allowed for better gas stream scrubbing as shown in the environmental emissions test. The actual emissions numbers for these tests are not for publication. However, it can be stated that the treated test had a greater potential for fluoride evolution than the untreated test, but had a 20.1% lower emissions under the same scrubber conditions. This confirms the earlier observations on fuel conversion with the improved flame characteristics with the treated fuel.
Improved potential for increasing production rates. Due to the Potential to Emit (PTE) for Fuel Oil, the granular plant is BTU/hr limited. The standard practice is to assign 015 mm BTU/gal for the redefined oil used. The more fuel usage the treated fuel will support 3% on average more product rate than the untreated oil.
Lowered Cost. The savings in fuel cost is obvious. The hidden cost savings in the reduction of burner nozzle replacements, combustion chamber repairs, and tank cleaning are there, but yet to be defined.
Syntek’s Xtreme Fuel Treatment has proven claims and I am happy to have played a part in it’s introduction to our cost savings idea.”
Marine Operations
Dear Sir:
“My company began using Xtreme Fuel Treatment. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you and the Syntek Distributors for making us aware of this product and giving us the opportunity to try it.
At the onset Syntek Distributors agreed to a protocol and a set of requirements that Xtreme Fuel Treatment must meet to be considered successful and cost effective. After completing a three month test, Syntek Distributors put together a report to document the results. We appreciate your professionalism in conducting the test and documenting the test results. After using the product and comparing the documented test results with our in house records, agrees that Xtreme Fuel Treatment has met or exceeded the requirements agreed to in the protocol.
Our greatest and most significant results were first observed in our boiler operation. These results were the first obtained and could be visibly seen with the naked eye. The benefits from our sludge boiler was very impressive and has enable us to save a substantial amount of revenue. These savings have come from every aspect of the boilers operations too numerous to detail.
One part of the test conducted by Syntek Distributors was to demonstrate a reduction in our emissions. Although we have not tested the emissions ourselves, we have noticed less smoke during maneuvers and the smoke is a lighter color. We have less soot in the economizes and exhaust boilers which leads us to believe the Carbon Mass Balance Test results which showed reductions of emissions and particulate matter.
A subsequent test was conducted by Syntek Distributors to determine the effect of replacing 180 HFO with 320 HFO on certain ships of ours. This test showed that we were able to do this with no loss of the improvements we’ve seen from prior tests while still maintaining our pumpability and sustaining the same bar, temperature and viscosity.”
For over 20 years this product has been tested and proven all around the world to substantially reduce emissions, while at the same time, improving fuel economy and prolonging the life of engines. There have been Hundreds of tests done over those years.

No comments:

Post a Comment